While I’ve not had the chance to watch the video (I will as soon as I can, there are a few torrent links to copies around the place), I have been able to find a smattering of links that further my initial points.
Quackfiles, Quackwatch, ACAHF, Houstonpress, James Randi: Forums, Yahoo! Answers.
There is a lot of reading in those links, a few are really long.
But essentially, this guys cure for cancer is to inject piss into people.
Admittedly it’s not as crassly simple as that, but the stated mechanism of effect involves an extract of urine and the DNA of the cancer. The main issue is that the extract is too large to interface with DNA molecules. There are many others, but this one is the crux.
Also for a guy that has faced a conspiracy to have his work shut down, he sure makes a lot of money. The FDA have not stopped him conducting reasonable research under the same conditions that all medical treatments must go through.
And when he is asked to detail the methods so others can duplicate and confirm his work he refuses.
Instead, he uses loop holes in FDA regulations to allow people to get his treatment, but only if they pay large sums of money.
If there was really a giant, government endorsed conspiracy with “Big Pharma” to stop this guy’s work, the CIA would simply disappear him. It’s not like the US doesn’t have world wide secret prisons full of people who have never had a charge made against them is it?
And it’s not like the are no other cancer cures being researched;
Virus used as anti cancer treament
Additionally, the US does not hold a monopoly on anti cancer research. Any other country can (and does) do cancer research independently to the US efforts. The first company that discovers the cure for all cancer will make more money than any other group in history. There are literally millions of people diagnosed with cancer every year.
And every one of them will gladly pay as much money as they have for a cure.
Which is why people like this guy get paid $100,000 to inject piss into people.
I will watch the documentary and I will use the evidence to determine my position on the matter.
But, extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.
